Both specs completed and saved. Template spec covers 4 templates (2 brands x Docs + Slides) with exact hex values, font sizes, margin measurements. Website spec includes sitemap, wireframes, content strategy, tech stack recommendation.
Template spec has exact color values, font stacks, specific measurements. Website spec rationale is strong ('single-page structure is correct for executive personal site'). No errors found in review. Minor: template spec assumes Google Apps Script without discussing alternatives.
Two detailed specs in one session. Reasonable for the complexity. Not exceptional, not slow.
Both specs follow a consistent structure. Quality is even across both deliverables. Small sample size limits confidence.
Website spec shows memory search results explicitly. Template spec does not. Inconsistent documentation of process. Format is clean and professional in both cases.
Demonstrated: UX design, documentation, specification writing. Two to three of twelve domains. Narrow but appropriate for role.
L3 tasks (multi-step, requirements partially ambiguous -- 'design a personal website' requires significant judgment on structure, content, and tech stack). Not L4 because no cross-system integration required.
Text-based output only. No evidence of tool usage beyond file writing. Effective at structured document creation but limited tool repertoire observed.
Level 2. Produced complete specs without intervention. Made sound judgment calls on structure and rationale.
N/A -- first assessment. Memory search inconsistency flagged but no prior assessment to compare against.
N/A -- Specialist archetype.
N/A -- Specialist archetype.
Spark produces clean, well-structured specification documents with strong rationale sections. The website spec stands out for explaining WHY decisions were made -- "single-page structure is correct for executive personal site" -- rather than just prescribing choices. This is the mark of a designer who thinks about purpose, not just output.
The template spec is thorough with exact values a developer could implement without asking questions. Both deliverables are implementation-ready, which is the gold standard for specification work.
The gap is in process discipline, not output quality. Memory search was documented in one spec but not the other. This inconsistency, while minor, suggests the agent treats process documentation as optional rather than mandatory. On two tasks, this is a small sample -- but the inconsistency is notable.
Spark's capability score is constrained by narrow domain breadth and limited tool usage -- both expected for a specialist designer. The path to Proficient+ on performance is simple: document memory search in every deliverable, every time.